Induced demand is a fascinating concept that is often observed in transportation infrastructure, where constructing more roads or highways can lead to an increase in traffic, as people may choose to drive instead of taking a short but inconvenient flight. However, the real uptick in induced demand happens when there is an increase in both supply and automation, such as the use of cars on autopilot on larger roads. This phenomenon is not limited to transportation infrastructure and can be observed in other sectors as well.

Creating test cases is often a dull and exhausting task, much like driving in congested traffic. Unlike driving, test case generation lacks any sense of excitement or thrill - it is consistently monotonous. However, the negative impact of testing is not confined to just writing test cases. Fixing failing tests can be an even more tiring process. To add to the burden, managers often express concerns about inadequate test coverage, which is a valid concern from their point of view.

Automating test case generation, execution, rerunning, and related processes can significantly alleviate testing-related challenges. However, the issue is not limited to these processes alone. When running test cases, developers are essentially testing an underlying service. Service is not an island but is intricately connected to other services both upstream and downstream.

Talking about islands lets use Hawaii as an analogy. imagine we want to test traffic bottlenecks on a specific road in Hawaii. This road is not isolated but is connected to other roads, and the flow of traffic in and out of those roads is essential to consider. Moreover, there are five islands in Hawaii with a reasonable road network, but these islands are not connected, and there is the deep blue sea in between.

o ensure efficient testing, it is crucial to consider only the connected roads when testing a specific road or its segment. The same approach should be taken when testing a service, where only the upstream and downstream services that are functionally connected should be tested. This targeted testing approach allows for comprehensive coverage while reducing unnecessary testing efforts and time. is a powerful tool that automates the process of identifying service dependencies, creating DevOps environments to run tests and services, and ensuring comprehensive test coverage. This saves developers a significant amount of time and effort while also improving the quality of the service being tested. With, developers can streamline their testing process, allowing them to focus on more important tasks. To learn more about how can help you with your testing needs, visit

Roost helps us address cost issues by providing capabilities that allow our team and users to control the amount of time a cluster runs... Early results reveal cluster run-time savings over 80% from our previous environment.

CTO, Enterprise Security Company
Rishi Yadav

About Rishi Yadav

Rishi is the CEO and Co-Founder of Roost and has over two decades of experience in leading enterprise application teams. He is a published author and active blogger.

Please Share this Blog

You may find these blog posts of interest too.

TDD is Dead: The Emergence of User Story-Driven Development
TDD is Dead: The Emergence of User Story-Driven Development
March 17, 2023

Do you know anyone who loves writing test cases? How about someone who doesn't enjoy telling or listening to stories? Th...

Beyond the 10X Developer: The Rise of the 100X Developer and the Role of the Prompt Engineer
Beyond the 10X Developer: The Rise of the 100X Developer and the Role of the Prompt Engineer
March 17, 2023

As generative AI continues to disrupt the development landscape, the question naturally arises: what will the future of ...